School Health Complaints Not Due to
Mold
Testing was done in one of
our elementary schools due to staff complaints about headaches,
fatigue, and other symptoms. The testing was also prompted by water
infiltration due to roof leaks. The highest level of Aspergillus/Penicillium
in one classroom was 252 (count per cubic meter). Other molds at
lower concentrations were: Alternaria (21), Ascospores (84),
Basidiospores (42), Cladiosporium (42), Epicoccum (21), Myxomycetes
(42), Pestalotia (21) and Pithomyces (42). Outdoor testing did not
indicate the presence of any of these mold spore types. Testing was
done in the winter in northern Massachusetts. Should we have any
concerns for the health of students and staff?-Brian
, New Hampshire
These test results do not indicate
that a mold exposure problem exists in your school spaces where
samples were collected. In addition to the fact that counts being
relatively low, most spores identified are characteristically from
outdoor mold genera. One can fairly ask why should there be outdoor
mold present indoors when the outdoor sample did not have any of
these mold genera present? That actually is easy to explain.
Outdoor mold types under winter time conditions are fewer in number
and different from those observed in other seasons. The indoor
samples were likely collecting mold spores that entered the building
in the past (most likely during the fall months). Such spores can
go through many cycles of settling out and being re-suspended
(months or more).
One of the problems that has
occurred with building owners and occupants’ focus on mold in the
past decade has been the fact that every indoor air quality health
concern has become for all practical purposes a mold concern or
issue. Unfortunately, this has meant that other long-standing and
even more likely causes of indoor air quality/health complaints have
been ignored.
In school buildings occupant
complaints of headaches and fatigue are highly unlikely to be
associated with mold exposures that primarily cause allergy-type
respiratory symptoms. Rather such symptoms are characteristic of
poor ventilation conditions.
Studies that we have conducted as
well as studies on school buildings/classrooms in Texas indicate
that approximately 50% of public school classroom spaces are
slightly-to-very poorly ventilated based on measurements of carbon
dioxide (CO2), an indicator of ventilation adequacy.
My historical experience in
conducting problem building investigations (most notably in school
buildings) is that complaints of headache and fatigue are indicator
symptoms of poor quality air associated with inadequate outside air
being provided for ventilation. The causal agents are not known but
are likely to be human bioeffluents, substances that we individually
release into building spaces. Carbon dioxide is the most abundant
and easily-measured human bioeffluent and can be used as an
indicator of overall bioeffluent levels.
In my investigations it was
typically the case that with increasing CO2 levels the
complaint rates of headache and fatigue increased, with occupants
indicating that headaches/fatigue were first noted in the morning
hours between 10-11:00 a.m. and resolved within an hour or so after
leaving the building.
On a probability scale it is most
likely that staff air quality/health complaints are associated with
poor ventilation conditions in the school building and that the
water intrusion problem/mold concern distracted individuals involved
from identifying the most likely causal factor for complaints.
February 13, 2008